The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering

Sandel often introduces counterarguments that appear to refute his own initial claims. What purposes does this rhetorical strategy serve? How does it shape his overall argument?

What core values underlie Sandel’s opposition to genetic engineering in humans? How does he articulate these values and make the case for their application to this developing branch of science and medicine?

Critically examine the Epilogue about stem cell research. How does this new chapter contribute to the overall point Sandel is making? How does he draw a moral distinction between stem cell research and bioengineering?